Skip to content

Stadia after two months

I’ve been using Stadia for a couple of months now, and I like it. As I mentioned in a previous post, I’m more of a casual gamer than a hardcore one, so I was drawn to Stadia by the ability to play console games without the upfront cost of buying a console (although I did have to pay for the Stadia controller, it should be reusable as a generic USB controller in the event I stop using Stadia.

After two months I’m still enjoying Stadia and playing it regularly. More specifically, I’ve been enjoying and playing Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey. After initially thinking more about the technology, now I primarily focus on the games. Destiny 2 was initially fun, but it quickly got repetitive and I lost interest in it. I’m sure it’s got a passionate fan base, but I personally don’t really see the appeal; I didn’t find the storyline that compelling. AC:O, by contrast, has way more story than I expected. Every time I suspect I might be nearly the end of the game, there’s more game.

My shift to focusing on the games highlights the primary challenge I think Stadia faces. If you’re focused on the latest and greatest games, Stadia’s library is still sorely lacking. If, like me, you’re more interested in just playing some fun games, Stadia is a great way to try them without committing to a console. To bring in the gamer audience, Stadia needs to grow its library as quickly as it can. Which they clearly recognize and are working to do.

The part of Stadia’s technology that I really like is its ability to work across devices. While I starting off playing mostly on our TV using the Chromecast Ultra, these days I primarily play off the iMac in our office. It’s really convenient to be able to choose which device to play on, rather than being tied to a particular room and device.

I wasn’t sure in my first month of use whether I’d stick with Stadia, but for now I’m planning to continue my subscription once my initial three month subscription completes.

Android on Chrome OS: kind of embarrassing

These days I often reach for my Pixelbook over my Macbook Pro, often because it’s easy for me to log into my work account as well as my personal one. Plus the keyboard still way better than the awful butterfly one; here’s hoping Apple quickly introduces their improved keyboard across their laptop line (although I haven’t personally tried it, so I can’t yet verify how much it’s actually improved).

But I gotta say, Android on Chrome OS is still kind of a mess. Why can I still not put apps on the home screen? Why is there still no clear differentiation between Android apps and web pages? And why on earth do downloads from the Play Store occasionally slow to a crawl?

The latter is something I’ve observed twice now. For no clear reason, downloads (both new installs and updates) from the Play Store will suddenly slow to a crawl. We’re talking 20 minutes to download and install a 10 mb update slow. The slowness will last for a couple of weeks, and then suddenly it’ll clear up, again for no clear reason.

I suspect it’s potentially an issue with Google Play Services, since at the same time content will stop downloading in the Play Movies & TV app (or it could be an issue with the Download Manager, assuming PM&T uses it to refresh the app content, but is possible but not certain). None of the proposed workarounds suggested online work: forcing stopping apps or services, clearing caches, clearing data. It’s frankly embarrassing that Google even has to propose those solutions; an app should never force users to go in and manually clear out the app’s data. Don’t get me started on the proposed “uninstall and reinstall Android” solution.

I really hope that the relevant teams at Google identify and fix the issue(s). If the company wants to run with Android on Chrome OS as their preferred tablet and laptop solution, they need to make the ability to download and update apps rock solid. A solution that doesn’t reliably let you use apps isn’t a solution.

Final Star Wars trilogy: Abrams vs. Johnson

We (finally) got around to seeing Rise of Skywalker last night. It was fun, but afterward we could help comparing J.J. Abram’s movies (Force Awakens, Rise of Skywalker) against Rian Johnson’s (Last Jedi). I know a lot of die hard fans complained about Johnson’s entry, but frankly it was the best movie of the three.

My major issue with Abram’s movies is that they were intellectual lazy: they didn’t bother to tell an original story. They instead just loosely copied the structure of the corresponding entry in the previous trilogy. Force Awakens? Planet destroying base threatening the rebellion, our heroes have to infiltrate an imperial base, the bad guys kill an older father figure, and after much running around the good guys manage to destroy the base at the last second. It’s A New Hope with some tweaks.

Rise of Skywalker? Look, it’s the emperor! We’re not even going to bother to have a new bad guy, we’ll just recycle the old one along with the plot. Once again he’s poised to crush the rebellion. The good guys have to figure out how to get to him, and they need to take down the shields of the Death Star, I mean imperial cruisers, before they can destroy it. I mean them. All looks lost, to essentially the same sequence in the emperor’s throne room with him gloating, until things turn around at the last second. Sure, it’s not exactly Return of the Jedi, but the structure is pretty damn close.

Johnson’s entry, although many fans got all bent out of shape about Luke still essentially being a rather whiny twit (which, let’s face it, is pretty much his character in 4-6), was actually a fairly original tale. Yes, we still have the mentor sequence, with Luke instead of Yoda, but Johnson arguably keeps it different enough to not feel like he’s just cribbing off Empire Strikes Back. And Ren taking out Snoke in the second movie was definitely an angle I did not see coming. I was actually looking forward to Ren being the sole bad guy in the final film, which hopefully was the direction Johnson was heading in.

But then some hardcore fans got bent out of shape, Disney panicked, Johnson got booted, and we ended up with Return of the Jedi 2, now more returny, instead of something more interesting. Ah well. It was still a fun movie, but I bet Johnson’s version would have been better.

Trying Apple News+

Apple bumped their standard one month free trial of Apple News+ up to three months over the holidays, so I finally opted to give it a try. I’d been tempted for awhile; surely it’d be great to be able to read The New Yorker, The Atlantic, National Geographic, and others whenever I felt like it, all through the convenience of my tablet?

But in practice I just haven’t made that much use of the trial. Sure, I skim the article headlines in The New Yorker whenever a new issues comes out, but I actually read very few articles. And the weekly publication schedule feels somewhat relentless. I already have a backlog of books to read; piling new content that keeps inexorably arriving on top seems like it’d make me feel wasteful for spending money on content that I didn’t get around to reading. I subscribe to the New York Times and use that subscription every day (I generally read it over breakfast), but I think I’ll just quietly let my News+ trial expire when my three months are up.

Healdsburg

We spent the long MLK weekend in Healdsburg, up in Sonoma county. I’ve been curious about it for years, but it never quite crossed the threshold into actually sparking a visit. But the long weekend seemed like a good opportunity, since we didn’t have anything pressing keeping us in town. And with the fires in Sonoma last fall, spending some money in the area seemed like a worthwhile thing to do. We stayed directly in the town, at the Harmon Goest House, roughly half a block from the main town square. It was a good location, since the area around the square is very walkable and has a bunch of shops (including two bookstores!), restaurants, and tasting rooms.

We intentionally made it a low-key weekend, poking around the town, eating some tasty food, and exploring. We did hop in the car to drive roughly 10 minutes to the parking lot for the Fitch Mountain open space preserve. The mountain is really a large hill at the eastern edge of town, but hiking up it got us a bit of exercise (useful after all the food) and provided some nice views of the Russian River and surrounding countryside. I suspect it’d be fun to raft or kayak the river in warmer weather, but that’d be balanced by the increased number of visitors you’d have to endure.

Christmas moose and… koalas?

Google generally does a nice job of decoration its buildings for the holidays; I like the aesthetic of the displays they’ve done the last couple of years. They don’t put displays up in every building, but this year they decorated both our old and new buildings.

IMG 20191227 121105

Our old building’s display is a winter scene with a moose, which seems appropriate for the holidays. Plus the wooden moose sculpture is just cool. Our new building’s display, by contrast, includes a winter scene with koalas, which, just, what? It’s summer in Australia during the holidays; shouldn’t this either be a summer scene or feature a different (northern hemisphere) animal?

IMG 20191227 150829

Holiday lights at Filoli

This year we finally got around to seeing the holiday lights at Filoli (for that matter, it was our first time seeing Filoli period). We’d heard about the lights before, but we’d never gotten around to catching them. But after 13 years in the Bay Area, we finally got around to it. The lights are definitely worth checking out, and at some point we’ll have to go back and see the house and grounds in the day time (possibly in the spring, when the gardens should be lovely).